Passa ai contenuti principali

Unvaccinated adults increasing risk of disease for all of us and at work. Occupational medicine should investigate !



Unvaccinated adults increasing risk of disease for all of us and at work. Occupationel medicine schould investigate!




Vaccines are in the spotlight again.

Public attention has recently focused on improving vaccination 
rates in Australian infants and children. But actually the largest 
unvaccinated group of people recommended for immunisation are 
adults.
 The Conversation
Of 4.1 million unvaccinated Australians, 92% (3.8 million) are 
adults, and only a small fraction are children.

Improving adult vaccination rates will reduce their risk of illness 
and death, and lower transmission of infection in the community.

Fewer adults than children are vaccinated


The government provides free adult vaccines for influenza (flu), 
pneumococcal pneumonia and shingles for people over the aged of 
65 years, and selected vaccines for those with underlying medical 
conditions, Indigenous people older than 15 years and pregnant 
women.

However, our latest research shows that only 51% of older 
Australian adults receive all government-funded vaccinations each 
year, compared to 93% of Australian children, and 73% of 
Australian adolescents. Coverage in eligible high-risk groups is 
even lower: around 40% of people with medical or occupational 
risk factors receive their annual influenza vaccine, and only 
13% of indigenous young adults with medical risk factors receive 
their pneumococcal vaccine. Migrants, refugees and travellers are 
also often at risk and under-vaccinated.

Non-immunised children form a very small proportion of under-
vaccinated Australians, yet public health efforts focus on coercive 
measures and financial penalties to improve immunisation rates in 
infants. Unvaccinated adults have been ignored.

Adults suffer from and spread diseases

Adults contribute substantially to ongoing epidemics of vaccine-
preventable diseases. Most cases of whooping cough, for 
example, occur in adults. About half of all cases of measles that 
occur in Australia are in those aged 19 years or over.

In addition to poor adult vaccination rates contributing to the high 
cost of managing preventable infections, adults are often the 
starting point for epidemics because they have the highest rate of
 infections and so transmit infection more. Better vaccination rates 
in adults will reduce both cost and risk.

Health workers can be a vector for infection and trigger outbreaks 
among vulnerable patients. The highest risk institutions are 
hospitals, childcare centres and aged care facilities.

Health care and other institutions facilitate intense infection 
transmission and explosive outbreaks, where vulnerable patients, 
elderly residents or children may become ill and even die. The 
purpose of staff vaccination in these settings is not only individual 
protection, but protection of patients or children.

Staff have an ethical duty of care to reduce their own risk of 
infection and the risk they may pose to vulnerable others. Workers 
themselves may be at increasing risk, since hospitals and aged care 
facilities have an ageing workforce with associated underlying 

The case for mandatory flu vaccination

Uptake rates of staff influenza vaccination continue to be low. 
Rates of vaccination in day care centre workers are less than 50%,
 and variably low in aged care workers and health workers.

When hospitals in the USA introduced mandatory influenza 
vaccination for health care staff, the response was variable, with 
legal challenges in New York.

There have been some great success stories lately from Melbourne,
 where hospitals have been able to get rates up to 80%. However, 
these hospitals have committed resources and personnel to 
implement intensive campaigns. Such vaccination campaigns based 
on voluntary or educational interventions will increase vaccination 
rates to 70-80%, but campaigns must be sustained and don’t 
achieve rates higher than this.

The groundwork for the introduction of mandatory influenza 
vaccination has been laid by many states and territories in 
Australia. For example, NSW introduced legislation in 2007 that 
required health care workers to demonstrate evidence of protection 
against a range of vaccine preventable diseases. The policy change 
was surprisingly well received and accepted by hospital staff.

Other states have similar recommendations for health care workers,
 but vary in the vaccines included and/or staff targeted. However, in 
all instances to date the influenza vaccine continues to be highly 
recommended but not required.

Mandatory vaccination still remains a controversial strategy that 
pits staff autonomy against patient safety. Coercive measures do 
work, but raise ethical issues. Further, some argue that the 
evidence of patient benefit for influenza is overstated.

Poor uptake of adult vaccination is due to many factors, including 
difficulty of access, lack of vaccination records, low perceived 
level of risk from vaccine-preventable diseases, lack of faith in 
vaccines for adults and value judgements about older people.

A range of strategies can improve vaccination rates, including 
a whole of life immunisation register, which helps doctors keep 
track of their patient’s vaccine history, eliminating financial 
barriers to vaccination, recording indigenous status and medical 
risk factors of patients, recommending vaccination to patients and 
providing reminders.

To improve immunisation in any occupational setting, it is 
important to commit resources, design health promotion programs, 
and provide culturally sensitive education on the risk of influenza 
and the overall benefits of vaccination.

It is also important to remove barriers and use regulation. For 
example, hospitals have patient infection outcomes linked to 
accreditation, but not staff vaccination. There are no such 
requirements for child care or aged care facilities. We could 
consider linking vaccination rates of staff to regulation of these 
institutions. We also need to ensure there are no other barriers to 
getting staff vaccinated.


C Raina MacIntyre, Professor of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, Head of the School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW; Holly Seale, Senior Lecturer, UNSW, and Rob Menzies, Senior Lecturer, UNSW

Commenti

Post popolari in questo blog

SINDROME DI CARRO DEL BESTIAME PER I PENDOLARI DEL TRENO !

SINDROME DI CARRO DEL BESTIAME PER I PENDOLARI DEL TRENO ! Una nota psicologa e psicoterapeuta di Vicenza, Sabina Scattola , pendolare di oltre 50 km al giorno, ha parlato di “ sindrome da carro bestiame ”per definire la situazione di migliaia di pendolari del treno. Ecco cosa dice la dott.ssa Scattola sulla suddetta sindrome: 'Essere costretti a viaggiare per molto tempo nelle seguenti condizioni: 1)treni e autobus in ritardo, 2)coincidenze che saltano, 3)sovraffollamento e scarse condizioni igieniche, 4)rumori e suoni disturbanti in ambienti caotici dove le distanze prossemiche non sono minimamente rispettate, 4) viaggio sia di a/r si presenta sempre carico di molte incognite e variabili intervenienti, di cui il pendolare ha scarso potere di controllo e tanto meno di padronanza o intervento (condizione di impotenza). non può che alterare l’equilibrio mentale e rendere il soggetto più vulnerabile ad attacchi di rabbia, di ira. Ad alterare il pendolare che fa us

DIFFERENZE DI STIPENDI TRA UOMINI E DONNE.PORTALE-BLOG MEDICINA DEL LAVORO ITALUA-GERMANIA

DIFFERENZE DI STIPENDI TRA UOMINI E DONNE GENDER-PAY-GAP è il più alto nel Brandeburgo Le donne guadagnano meno degli uomini -per gli stessi lavori e con le stesse qualifiche. È il cosiddetto 'Gender Pay Gap'. L'Ufficio Federale di Statistica parla di 9.3 % di divario di salario tra uomini e donne nel.Brandeburgo e di 4.4% nello Schleswig-Holstein. Dal luglio 2017, in Germania è in vigore la legge sulla trasparenza dei salari. I lavoratori possono sapere -a certe condizioni- quanto guadagna un collega simile. Tuttavia, non esiste un diritto di parità di retribuzione.

Industrie 4.0, Adaptive Arbeitsassistenzsysteme (AAS), und Ambient Intelligence (AmI)

Die technologischen Innovationen sind ein Schluesselfaktor der Wettbewerbsfaehigkeit von Unternehmen und der derzietige Entwicklungstrend in der Industrie 4.0. Die Industrie 4.0 will komplette Fabriken ganzheitlich vernetzen und Echtzeitfaehigkeit erreichen. Dies wird auch ueber Untenehmensgrenzen hinaus realisiert, mit dem Maximalziel einer sich selbst steuernden Produktion. Sicherheit, Gesundheit und das Wohlbefinden der Beschaeftigten sind das Ziel dieser Entwicklungen. Die Forschung der BAuA ist die Technikfolgen zu identifizieren, damit effizientgetriebene Entwicklungen der Industrie eine menchengerechte Arbeitsgestaltung geben. AmL ( Ambient Intelligence) will Methoden, Konzepte und Arbeitssysteme der Industrie 4.0 fokussieren, die die Arbeitstaetigkeit unterstuetzen- sogennante 'Adaptive Arbeitsassistenzsysteme (AAS).